|
Section |
Changes from Perkins III to Perkins IV
|
Bottom line impact |
| |
|
|
|
Definitions
Articulation agreement |
Four new
definitions are added – for “Articulation Agreement,” “Scientifically Based
Research,” “Secondary Education Tech Prep Student,” and “Postsecondary Education
Tech Prep Student.” |
|
| |
Articulation
agreement must be agreed to at the state level or approved annually by the
lead administrators of a secondary institution and a postsecondary institution,
or a sub baccalaureate degree granting postsecondary institution and a baccalaureate
degree granting postsecondary institution. The articulation agreement must
link programs through credit transfer agreements, and lead to technical
skill proficiency, a credential, certificate, or a degree. |
|
|
“Vocational
and Technical Education,” which is now “Career and Technical Education.”
(CTE) |
Restriction
lifted—law now allows preparation for careers requiring a baccalaureate,
master’s or doctoral degree |
|
|
Definition
of an “eligible institution.” |
Current law
allows for profit entities to also provide courses and receive funding
under Perkins |
|
|
Transition
plan |
Transition
plans to be submitted Spring 2007 |
Transition
plans will be accepted for the 2007-2008 school year. |
|
Plans |
|
Must submit
a six year plan—to include input from: charter
school authorizers and organizers, employers, labor organizations, parents,
students, and community organization. Also to be included are faculty, administrators,
career guidance and academic counselors, charter school authorizers and
organizers, institutions of higher education, the state Tech Prep coordinator
and representatives of consortia (if applicable), entities participating
in WIA, parent and community organizations, and representatives of small
business to groups that must be consulted on state plan development, and
specifies that both academic and CTE teachers must be involved. |
|
Programs
of study |
Description
required of programs of study |
A description of the career and technical programs
of study, which may be adopted by LEAs and postsecondary institutions to
be offered as an option to students (and their parents as appropriate) when
planning for and completing future coursework; to include career and technical
content areas that incorporate secondary education and postsecondary education
elements; coherent and rigorous content aligned with challenging academic
standards and relevant career and technical content in a coordinated, nonduplicative
progression of courses that align secondary education with postsecondary
education to adequately prepare students to succeed in postsecondary education;
may include the opportunity for secondary education students to participate
in dual or concurrent enrollment programs or other ways to acquire postsecondary
education credits; and lead to an industry-recognized credential or certificate
at the postsecondary level, or an associate or baccalaureate degree. A description
of how the eligible agency, in consultation with eligible recipients, will
develop and implement the career and technical programs of study.
Note: Locals must require one course of study |
|
Prohibitions |
CTE
is defined as providing a“technical skill proficiency, an industry-recognized credential,
a certificate, or an associate degree”
Specifies that CTE may include
prerequisite courses that meet the requirements of the definition, as long
as they are not remedial in nature |
Different
indicators for secondary and post secondary
See below under “Accountability” |
|
Allocations |
Changes to
only allow public and non-profit organizations to receive funding.Amount reserved for assistance to the outlying areas is
decreased from 0.2 percent to 0.13 percent. The amount reserved (0.54 percent)
for federal incentive grants to states is eliminated, as is the incentive
grant program |
This
increases the amount of funding going directly to states through the grant
formula. |
| |
New law will
only change current formula if Basic State grant appropriations exceed FY
06 levels |
Increased funding for
small states if funding increases. Small states will now receive their equitable
portion (a minimum of 0.5 percent) of the total allocation. Of any new
money appropriated, small
states would receive one-third of the new money until they reach the small
state minimum. These funds would go first to those states that are farthest
away from 0.5 percent of the total allocation. The remaining two-thirds
of new money would go out by the same formula as in current law |
|
Within
State Allocation |
Maintains
current law |
85
percent of funds must be distributed to local programs, 10 percent can be
used for state leadership activities, and 5 percent for state administration
activities. Supporting and developing state data systems to be used for
CTE is added as an allowable use of administrative funds. |
|
Accountability |
|
Eligible
recipients must now agree to accept the state levels of performance or negotiate
performance measures with the state the same way that states negotiate with
the federal government, and report student progress in achieving these performance
levels on an annual basis. Special populations (as defined in the Act)
must disaggregate this data and using No Child Left Behind (NCLB) subgroups,
and any disparities between a subgroup and all other students must be identified
and quantified (unless groups are too small). The report must be made available
in a variety of formats, including electronically. State reports must contain
disaggregated data as well. Under the six-year authorization of the Act,
states and locals would be required to negotiate adjusted levels of performance
three times -- for the first and second years, third and fourth
years, and fifth and sixth years. |
|
Negotiations |
States required
to negotiate every two years with locals re standards |
Locals will
either accept state levels or negotiate new ones. |
|
Section
118 |
New provision
requires that the application for Section 118 be submitted at the same time
as the state’s application for Basic State Grant funds |
- Need to provide information based on trends provided
in the Wagner-Peyser Act to inform program development.
- Increased focus on postsecondary information
and high-wage, high-skill, or high demand occupations and non-traditional
fields.
- Provision of readily available occupational information
in areas such as employment sectors and occupational supply and demand
is also added to the list of state activities.
|
|
Indicators |
Separate
core performance indicators for secondary and post secondary students |
At the secondary
level, academic attainment will now have to be measured by the academic
assessments a state has approved under NCLB. Graduation rates will
also have to be reported as defined in NCLB, and technical proficiency should
include student achievement on technical assessments that are aligned with
industry-recognized standards when possible.
At the postsecondary level,
academic attainment will no longer have to be reported as a separate measure,
but, like at the secondary level, technical skill proficiency should
include student achievement on technical assessments that are aligned with
industry-recognized standards when possible. Also at the postsecondary
level, student placement in high wage, high skill, or high demand occupations
or professions should be measured.
Measures of performance used for each indicator
must be valid and reliable, and to the extent possible, aligned with other
state and federal programs so that similar information can be gathered to
reduce administrative burdens. |
|
Improvement
Plans |
|
|
|
State
Leadership Activities |
Providing
technical assistance to eligible recipients a permissible use. |
|
| |
Consequences for failing to meet performance standards |
If a state or local program fails to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed
upon target for any of the indicators of performance, it will have to develop
and implement an improvement plan, with special consideration to performance
gaps between population subgroups. If no improvement is made, or the
state or local program fails to meet at least 90 percent of a performance
level for three years in a row, then the Secretary of Education or the state
could withhold a portion of that state or local program’s funding.
If funds are withheld from a
state, the Secretary must use them to provide technical assistance, assist
in the development of a new state improvement plan, or for other improvement
activities in the state. If a state withholds funds from a local program,
it must use them to provide, through alternative arrangements, services
and activities to students within the area served by the local program.
|
| |
Providing technical assistance for eligible
recipients is now a required use. |
|
|
PART C |
Requires states to ensure that professional
development is provided at both the postsecondary and secondary levels,.
Additions to professional development requirements include that it must:
i)Provide
in-service and preservice training to career and technical teachers in the
integration and use of rigorous academics with technical subjects, provided
jointly with academic teacher to the extent practical, and on effective
use of scientifically based research and data to improve instruction;
ii)Be
high quality, sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused in order to have
a positive and lasting impact on classroom instruction and the teacher’s
performance in the classroom, and not be one-day or short-term workshops
or conferences;
iii)Help
ensure teachers and personnel can effectively develop rigorous and challenging,
integrated academic and CTE education curricula jointly with academic teachers;
iv)Develop
a higher level of academic and industry knowledge and skills in CTE; and
v)Ensure
teachers can effectively use applied learning that contributes to the academic
and career and technical knowledge of the student.
Changes were made to the current state
permissible uses of funds, such as expanding language related to career
guidance and academic counseling programs; including adjunct faculty arrangements
under education and business partnerships; and specifically mentioning support
for career clusters, career academies, and distance education.
New permissible uses of funds include:
i)Support
for initiatives to facilitate the transition of sub
Baccalaureate
CTE students into baccalaureate degree programs.
ii)Awarding
incentive grants to eligible recipients for exemplary performance in carrying
out programs, or for pooling with other recipients for innovative initiatives.
iii) Providing
for activities to support entrepreneurship education and training.
iii) Developing
valid and reliable assessments of technical skills.
iv) Developing
and enhancing data systems to collect and analyze data on secondary and
postsecondary academic and employment outcomes.
v) Improving
the recruitment and retention of CTE teachers, faculty, administrators,
and career guidance and academic counselors, including individuals in groups
underrepresented in the teaching profession; and the transition to teaching
from business and industry, including small business.
vi) Support
for occupational and employment information resources, such as those described
in section 118. |
|
|
Distribution
to Local Programs |
At the postsecondary level, the state-to-local
formula remains the same. |
|
| |
Instead
of basing the secondary formula on individuals ages 15-19, information that
is not available, the new Act would codify the practice of basing the formula
on individuals ages 5-17. (law specifies must be from National Center for
Education Statistics’ Common Core of Data.) |
Local
Plan
Additional information that must be included
in the local plan includes:
- How the eligible recipient will meet its own
negotiated levels of performance.
- How the recipient will offer the appropriate
courses of at least one program of study.
- How secondary recipients will encourage CTE students
to enroll in rigorous and challenging core academic subjects.
- How professional development will promote the
integration of academic and technical education.
- How activities will be provided to prepare special
populations, including single parents and displaced homemakers, for high
skill, high wage, or high demand occupations that will lead to self-sufficiency.
- How career guidance and academic counseling will
be provided to CTE students, including linkages to future education and
training opportunities.
- Efforts to improve the recruitment and retention
of CTE teachers, faculty, and career guidance and academic counselors,
including individuals in groups underrepresented in the teaching profession;
and the transition to teaching from business and industry.
|
|
Tech
Prep |
Provides
new flexibility on the use of funds—States must make a choice in their State
Plans |
If states use this flexibility, all combined
funds must be distributed and used in accordance with Basic State Grant funds.
If states do not use this flexibility,
the provisions of Title II will apply to funds received from the Tech Prep grant.
Funds may still be distributed by the state to local consortia on a formula
basis or competitively. Additional language is added to authorize activities
to strengthen career guidance and counseling provisions, including through the
use of information available pursuant to Section 118, and encourage transition
between secondary and postsecondary education.
|
| |
The
definition of a Tech Prep program is incorporated in the program description
section, and is very similar to current law. |
Tech
Prep programs must lead to technical skill proficiency, an industry-recognized
credential, a certificate, or a degree in a specific career field, must
utilize CTE programs of study to the extent practical, and must coordinate
with activities conducted with Basic State Grant funds. |
|
Accountability
and Performance Indicators |
A
new section is added to the Act to strengthen accountability for the implementation
of Tech Prep programs. |
Each consortium that receives a Tech Prep
grant must establish and report on the following indicators of performance,
and enter into agreement with the state to meet a minimum level of performance
on each of these indicators (as well as the indicators under the Basic
State Grant):
- The number of secondary and postsecondary Tech
Prep students served.
- The number and percent of secondary Tech Prep
students who:
- Enroll in postsecondary education;
- Enroll in postsecondary education in the same
field;
- Complete a state or industry-recognized certification
or licensure;
- Complete courses that earn postsecondary credit;
- Enroll in remedial math, writing, or reading
courses upon entering postsecondary education.
- The number and percent of postsecondary Tech
Prep students who:
- Are placed in a related field of employment
within 12 months of graduation;
- Complete a state or industry-recognized certification
or licensure;
- Complete a two-year degree or certificate program
within the normal time;
- Complete a baccalaureate degree program within
the normal time.
If a consortium does not meet the agreed
upon levels of performance for 3 consecutive years, the state shall require
the consortium to resubmit its grant application, and may choose to terminate
the funding for the program or consortium (even if funds are awarded in
the state by a formula). |
|
Definitions |
New definitions
of students included for accountability purposes |
A “Secondary Education Tech Prep Student”
is defined as a student who has enrolled in two courses in the secondary
component of a Tech Prep program.
A “Postsecondary Education Tech Prep Student”
is defined as a student who has completed the secondary component of a
Tech Prep program and has enrolled in the postsecondary component at an
institution of higher education. |
|
General |
Supplement
not supplant language maintained as in current law |
|
| |
Private school
required to be included for professional development if requested in writing.
LEAs also required to consult with private non-profit schools to see if
meaningful participation by their students is warranted upon written request. |
Local school districts may use Perkins
funds to provide for private school participation. |